The West Asia conflict has disrupted shipping routes that carry the specialty gases, chemicals, and metals India’s new chip plants need to run. Pilot and mass-production timelines for projects including Tata Electronics’ fab in Dholera, Gujarat, could slip by six to twelve months. Capital and operating costs are climbing as energy spot prices spike, according to the Global Semiconductor Policy Council. The materials at risk include helium, bromine, copper, and tungsten.
The Government of India says it is ready to step in on bottlenecks. But the inputs come from a region it does not control, and air freight cannot close the gap.
India approved its first commercial chip fab on February 29, 2024. The plan was clean: build a domestic semiconductor base, cut reliance on imports, and stop being a customer in someone else’s supply chain. Two years on, the plan has hit a problem the policy did not price in.
The fabs are being built on stable Indian soil. Their lifelines are not.
The gases and chemicals these plants need to operate move by sea, and many of them originate in or pass through West Asia. The conflict there has tangled those routes. Specialty gases like helium, plus chemicals used in chip-making, are now arriving late and costing more. The result is a strategic exposure most coverage has missed: India’s bid for technological independence now depends on a region it has no say over. The delays are the symptom. The dependence is the story.
The inputs come from places India cannot influence
The scale of the bet is real. Tata Electronics’ fab in Dholera carries an approved investment of about USD 10.9 billion, with production targeted for 2026. Micron’s assembly and packaging plant in Sanand, Gujarat, adds another USD 2.75 billion, with central and state incentives covering up to 70% of the cost. Both run through the Semicon India Programme, the country’s main subsidy channel. You can read the approval terms in the government’s cabinet decision on the Dholera fab.
The problem is upstream. Danish Faruqui, CEO of Fab Economics and co-chair of the Global Semiconductor Policy Council, has argued that war-related shipping disruptions are squeezing the supply of specialty gases and chemicals for new fabs, raising both capex and opex and threatening timelines in newer locations like India. His core point is geographic. Qatar supplies more than a third of the world’s helium. Israel and Jordan together produce two-thirds of its bromine.
That concentration is the weak point. Photoresist, anti-reflective coatings, slurries, and clean chemistries feed both the building and the running of a plant — and the routes that carry them now run through a war zone.
Companies have tried to route around the blockages with emergency airlifts and overland trucking. It does not scale. Liquid helium moves in double-walled, vacuum-insulated containers weighing up to 30 tonnes, and carriers cap how much pressurised cryogenic cargo one aircraft can hold. Air freight runs roughly ten times the cost of ocean freight per shipment. “Airlifting is entirely unsustainable in the long run, operating as a costly, low-volume ‘band-aid’ that fails to meet the continuous, massive material demands of a modern semiconductor manufacturing plant,” Faruqui said. Tata has used airlifts anyway. That tells you how few options are left. The harder question is whether subsidies can fix a problem that sits in international waters.
Friendshoring still runs on unfriendly geography
The deeper issue is what “moving manufacturing out of China” actually buys. India built its fabs on politically safe ground. The upstream inputs still come from a handful of resource-rich states and travel through contested sea lanes. Relocating the plant does not relocate the supply chain.
There is a useful Western comparison here. Europe’s chip ambitions under the EU Chips Act, including new fabs in Germany and Italy, face the same shipping and energy pressures. But Europe has a denser network of regional suppliers and can move goods overland inside the bloc. India cannot. Its inputs travel longer maritime routes through West Asia, which means more schedule risk and more cost risk than a continental European fab carries. For a Western firm planning to source chips from India, that is the difference that matters: thicker inventory buffers and backup suppliers, not just a signed contract.
The honest limit on this story: some sources report that disruptions have eased and alternative sourcing is holding, which would blunt the delays. Faruqui’s position is the opposing read, and the evidence is not yet settled either way.
So the plan that was meant to deliver independence has revealed a new dependence instead. India can subsidise the buildings. It cannot subsidise the sea lanes.
Beyond the headline
The bigger picture
India’s chip push exposes how friendshoring still depends on unfriendly geography. New fabs in Gujarat sit on stable soil, but their lifelines run through contested waters and a few resource-rich states. Moving manufacturing out of China is not enough; states must also diversify their upstream inputs and transport corridors to claim real technological sovereignty.
The money trail
Rising logistics and energy costs will reshape who ends up controlling India’s semiconductor stack. Firms that can pre-finance larger inventories, lock in long-term supply contracts, or build local gas and chemical production will gain leverage over cash-strapped domestic players. That could tilt ownership of critical capacity toward deep-pocketed foreign suppliers and financial investors.
What isn’t being said
Most of the talk centres on imported gases and chemicals. Almost no one is discussing India’s reliance on foreign equipment vendors and construction crews whose own pipelines are already stretched. If tool deliveries or installation teams get quietly reassigned to safer geographies, India faces delays that no subsidy can solve.
What the next 18 months will actually test
With pilot timelines exposed to shipping routes India does not control, two groups need to watch specific signals rather than headline announcements.
- Western firms sourcing chips from India
Track investor disclosures from the specialty gas and equipment suppliers serving India-based fabs, focusing on their commentary about Red Sea and West Asia route disruptions and contract repricing. Build thicker inventory buffers and name backup suppliers now; a signed contract with an Indian fab is not the same as resilient supply.
- Investors in electronics manufacturing
Review the Semicon India Programme terms on the Ministry of Electronics and IT site (meity.gov.in) to understand the conditions behind state support. Then watch the next budget cycle: rising incentive allocations signal political will to absorb higher costs, while stalled approvals point to delayed financial closure and more cautious foreign partners.
Explainer
- Fab
- Short for fabrication plant, the factory where raw silicon wafers are turned into finished semiconductor chips. A single advanced fab can cost tens of billions of dollars and run on a continuous, uninterrupted supply of ultra-pure gases and chemicals. Tata’s Dholera plant is India’s first commercial fab, which is why a supply interruption there carries outsized strategic weight.
- Semicon India Programme
- India’s main subsidy scheme for building a domestic chip industry, run under the India Semiconductor Mission. It offers up to 50% of project cost for fabs and packaging units, which state governments can top up toward roughly 70% through land, power, and capital support. Unlike the US and EU equivalents, it attaches few explicit geopolitical conditions, favouring investment promotion over guardrails.
- Specialty gases
- High-purity industrial gases such as helium used at almost every stage of chip-making, from cooling to etching. The global market sits in the high single-digit billions of dollars and is growing at roughly 6.5% a year, driven partly by semiconductor demand. Their production is geographically concentrated, with Qatar alone supplying more than a third of the world’s helium.
- EU Chips Act
- The European Union’s 2023 framework to roughly double its share of global chip production by 2030. It pairs subsidies for new fabs with rules on supply security and research collaboration. European projects share India’s exposure to energy and shipping costs, but benefit from overland routes inside the bloc that India’s sea-bound supply chain cannot match.
RELATED STORIES
