One Chinese company has done what no other proptech firm in Asia has managed: digitise the entire home transaction, not just the listing. KE Holdings, the operator of the Beike platform, reported RMB 66.9 billion in 2025 net revenues — about US$9.4 billion — with existing-home and emerging-services segments now contributing over half of that total. No regional rival has come close to replicating the model.
Across Southeast Asia and India, listings moved online years ago. The hard parts — financing, brokerage, conveyancing — remain stubbornly offline, blocked by fragmented land records and low trust.
Asia’s property markets are not waiting for better apps. They are waiting for someone to solve a trust problem that software alone cannot fix. Listings went online a decade ago across China, India, Singapore and Seoul. The valuable part of a property deal — the money, the paperwork, the broker taking a cut — mostly did not.
One company cracked it. Beike, run by KE Holdings, built a network that standardises how homes are listed, verified and brokered across China, then takes a slice of every completed deal. It is the only platform in Asia that owns the transaction end to end.
The obvious reading is that the rest of the region is simply behind, and will catch up. The more accurate reading is that it may not. What lets Beike work is not better code. It is a market structure — centralised land data, a single regulatory regime, a dense agent network — that most of Asia does not have and cannot quickly build.
The model that does not travel
Start with what Beike actually does. Its Agent Cooperation Network connects rival brokerages and splits commissions between the listing agent and the selling agent. That split is the trick. It removes the incentive to hide listings or fake them, and a verified-listings database kills the duplicate ads that plague every other Asian portal.
The scale is real, and so is the strain. KE Holdings’ 2025 financial results show the company leaning hard into existing-home sales, rentals and renovation as China’s housing downturn drags on new-build volumes. Stanley Ching, Head of Real Estate, Asia-Pacific at Citic Capital, argues that platforms like Beike have become “critical infrastructure” for transaction data and liquidity in a weakening market. The downturn did not break the model. It shifted what the model sells.
Now look at who cannot copy it. Asia’s regulatory and technical fragmentation is the wall. PropertyGuru, Southeast Asia’s largest portal, was taken private by EQT for about US$1.1 billion in September 2024, two years after its New York listing. It still runs a portal — agent subscriptions, developer ads — not a transaction engine. CEO Hari Krishnan has said the post-privatisation plan is to deepen mortgage and data tools rather than stay a pure listings site.
India shows a different angle on the same problem. NoBroker hit a US$2.1 billion valuation in November 2021 by removing brokers entirely, connecting owners and tenants directly across six cities. Co-founder Amit Agarwal maintains the direct-owner model cuts cost and information gaps in a broker-heavy market. It works on matching. It does not yet own conveyancing — because India’s land records do not allow it.
The pattern points to a structural answer, not a timing one. The transaction gap is documented across every market. What is less understood is why centralised China closed it and fragmented Asia has not.
Land records, not software, decide the winner
The thing that lets Beike own transactions is mostly invisible from outside China. It is data the state already holds in one place. Clean ownership records, a single national regulatory regime, and a brokerage market dense enough to network. Strip any of those out and the model stops working.
For Western readers, Zillow and Rightmove are the closest comparisons to Asia’s portals. Beike goes further: it controls the offline broker network and takes a cut of completed deals, where Zillow’s attempt to buy and flip homes exposed its balance sheet and was pulled back. Beike stayed asset-light. That is the harder thing to copy, not the app.
Yongheng Deng, Professor of Real Estate and Finance at the National University of Singapore, has highlighted exactly this: fragmented land records and opaque brokerage practices across much of Asia limit how fast any platform can take full transaction control. His point cuts against the assumption that the region just needs more funding. The barrier is not capital. It is the registry.
So the opening question resolves. Asia did not fail to digitise transactions because it lacked the technology. It is held back by what sits underneath the technology — the records, the rules, the trust. China had those aligned. Most of the region does not, which is why the next twelve to eighteen months will be decided in land registries and regulators’ offices, not in product launches.
Beyond the headline
The bigger picture
Asia’s proptech story is less about apps and more about who standardises messy, analogue property markets. The platforms that can turn opaque practices into digital rails gain lasting control over data, workflows and trust. That structural power will matter far more than listing traffic or headline valuations as capital and regulation converge on a few dominant transaction systems.
The money trail
Behind the consumer apps sits a deeper fight over fee pools long held by brokers, banks and developers. Each percentage point of commission, mortgage origination or renovation spend shifted onto digital rails is billions in redirected revenue. The investors funding the platforms that lock in these flows early will shape which companies win and how value gets split between incumbents and the software layer.
What isn’t being said
Most coverage celebrates the tech and skips how digitising transactions may create new gatekeepers. Once a platform sits between you and your identity, credit data and conveyancing, leaving it gets harder than walking away from today’s scattered systems. That raises questions about competition, data portability and regulatory scrutiny that investors should price into growth stories now.
What to track before the next earnings cycle
With KE Holdings’ next quarterly guidance expected in August 2026 and EQT yet to signal a timetable for PropertyGuru, the picture for Asian proptech is about to move. Here is where each reader should look.
- Institutional investors
Review KE Holdings’ latest NYSE filings and earnings presentations on investors.ke.com to see how its revenue mix between new homes, existing homes, rentals and renovation is shifting. If August guidance shows stabilising existing-home and rental volumes, China’s downturn is easing for platforms. If not, expect deeper diversification into services.
- Tech and proptech professionals
Download JLL’s “Global Real Estate Technology: Funding and Trends 2024” report from jll.com to benchmark Asia Pacific deal flow. Asia Pacific proptech funding ran near US$5.1 billion across 202 deals in 2023 — track which subsectors and geographies are pulling the most capital before you bet on a model.
- Western firms eyeing market entry
Map the regulatory floor first, not the product. Read India’s Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act for disclosure and registration rules any portal must build in. Transaction ownership in Asia needs deeper integration with local brokers and land systems than the US or UK ever demanded.
Explainer
- Beike
- Beike is the property platform run by Chinese firm KE Holdings, which also operates the Lianjia brokerage. It standardises listing, verification and brokering across China, taking a cut of completed deals through its agent-sharing network. Its verified-listings database was built partly to fight the fake and duplicate ads that still dominate rival portals elsewhere in Asia.
- Agent Cooperation Network
- Beike’s system for connecting competing brokerages and agents on one platform. It splits each commission between the listing agent and the selling agent to remove the incentive for hiding or faking listings. The split is the structural fix that makes shared, trusted transactions possible — and it depends on a broker network dense enough to enforce cooperation.
- Zillow
- Zillow is the dominant US online real-estate portal and the closest Western analogue to Asia’s listing platforms. Its attempt to buy and resell homes directly, known as iBuying, exposed heavy balance-sheet risk and was wound down in 2021. The episode shows why Beike’s asset-light model — owning the transaction without owning the inventory — is harder to copy than it looks.
- RERA
- India’s Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016, which requires projects and agents to register with state regulators. It mandates disclosure standards that proptech portals must build into their listing and transaction workflows. RERA also created state-level regulators with uneven enforcement, which is one reason India’s land and transaction data remains too fragmented for a Beike-style platform.
RELATED STORIES
